| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1179 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Kamrej Vibhag Kheti Pak Rupantar and Vechan Karnari Sahakari Mandli Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner of Service Tax
Powers of writ court-Entertaining of time barred appeals in rare and exceptional cases-A writ court was not bound by an alternative statutory remedy available and on its discretion could entertain a writ petition ignoring such statutory [LexDoc Id : 476543]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2014 |
Sandeep Bulk Carriers vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Wrongs committed by government officers or employees-Undertakings of State Government and Central Government to remedy such wrongs-The State Government had given an undertaking to the effect that it was considering to issue a government order to provide remedy including compensati [LexDoc Id : 476621]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2014 |
Chandan Steel Ltd. vs CCE and Service Tax
Option of paying reduced penalty imposed under s.11AC: Option sought only after dismissal of appeal-Benefit of reduced penalty granted in view of departmental circulars issued from time to time extending such option to assessee-On the questions whether an option of paying reduced penalty imposed on the assessee under s.11AC of the Central Excise Act 1944 was required to be ex [LexDoc Id : 476540]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2014 |
Puneet Kaushik and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 475532]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
Supreme Court of India vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal and Ors.
Right to information: Direction of CIC to maintain separate medical records of judges of Supreme Court-Information relating to medical records personal and exempt from disclosure under s.8(1)(j), No larger public interest shown, Petition allowed-On an application made by the first respondent under the Right to Information Act 2005, the Central Information Commission (CIC) had, inter alia, dire [LexDoc Id : 475530]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
CCE vs Supreme Industries Ltd. and CESTAT
[LexDoc Id : 478405]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
ONGC Ltd. vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 476622]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2014 |
CCE vs Bannai Amman Sugars Ltd.
Maintainability of appeal to high court: Question relating directly to determination of rate of duty for the purpose of assessment-Appeal not maintainable before high court, Appellant given liberty to approach appropriate forum-The high court held that the question as to the applicability of a notification or a circular, which had a bearing on the determination of rate of dut [LexDoc Id : 476542]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
CCE vs CESAT and Pepsico India Holdings Ltd.
Marketability of intermediate product: Demand of duty raised for relevant period time barred-Impugned order accepting limitation plea confirmed-On the question whether an intermediate product called 'sugar syrup' emerging in the course of manufacture of a branded product was marketable and if [LexDoc Id : 476541]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
State of Punjab and Ors. vs Nokia India (P) Ltd.
Tax liability: Cell phone charger-Battery in cell phone capable of charging through other means, Battery charger not a part of cell phone-Mobile or cell phone charger was an accessory to cell phone and was not a part thereof. Thus, battery charger could not be held to be a composite part [LexDoc Id : 476026]
|
SC |
2014 |
State of Punjab and Ors. vs Nokia India (P) Ltd.
Taxability of Battery Charger: Battery Charger to be treated as a part of cell phone-Concessional rate of tax on Battery charger-Assessing Authority held battery charger as a separate item which was liable to be taxed at general rate i.e. 12.5% and not at concessional rate appli [LexDoc Id : 474632]
|
SC |
2014 |
Associated Tours Madras (P) Ltd. vs Addl. CCE, CE
[LexDoc Id : 478404]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
Satish Kumar Sharma and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 478408]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2014 |
TVS Motors Co. Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 476341]
|
GOI |
2014 |
Ratna Industries vs CE and Service Tax
Availment of exemption: Brand names of ineligible companies found on goods cleared-Usage of symbol or brand name apparent, Benefit not available, Appeal dismissed -The appellant was availing the benefit of exemption Notification No. 175 dated 01 March 1986, as a small scale industry. Show cause notice was issued [LexDoc Id : 476173]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
CCE vs Ultramarine and Pigments Ltd.
Sufficient cause-Substantial justice vis-à-vis technical considerations-The expression 'sufficient cause' employed by the legislature was adequately elastic to enable the courts to apply the law in a meaningful manner, whi [LexDoc Id : 476172]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
CCE vs Mefco Engineers (P) Ltd.
Deletion of penalty: Mere payment of duty even after show cause notice no ground to waive penalty-Penalty under s.11AC mandatory and no element of discretion involved, Impugned order set aside-Where there was a specific mandate that the assessee would be liable to pay penalty, the mere payment of duty even after the show cause notice was not [LexDoc Id : 476171]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
Shanmugar Service vs CCE
Non-compliance of pre-deposit order-Tribunal having no discretion to entertain appeal-When the order of pre-deposit had not been complied with, the tribunal had no discretion to entertain the appeal. [LexDoc Id : 476018]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
CCE vs Electro Steel Casting Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 476340]
|
GOI |
2014 |
CCE vs Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 476202]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
Hundai Motor India Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 476176]
|
GOI |
2014 |
CCE vs Pallipalayam Spinners (P) Ltd.
Eligibility for availing cenvat credit: Goods used for taking intermediate product from one stage to another-Question raised in appeal squarely covered by earlier decision wherein issue decided in assessee's favour, Appeal dismissed-The tribunal had held that the impugned goods were accessories, which were used for taking intermediate product from one stage to another and, therefo [LexDoc Id : 476017]
|
HC (Madras) |
2014 |
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs Astt. CC and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 478500]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2014 |
Gambhir Construction Co. vs CCE and Service Tax and Anr.
Discretion to dispense with requirement of pre-deposit: Strong prima facie case-Satisfaction of authority as regards financial hardship-While considering provisions of pre-deposit of duty and penalty, the authority concerned had to examine the question whether the appellant had a good [LexDoc Id : 476025]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2014 |
CCE vs Simac Group India Ltd.
Maintainability of appeal under s.35G: Appeal against order-in-original passed in Mumbai-Appeal not maintainable, Applicant relegated to high court of competent jurisdiction-Instant appeal filed under s.35G of the Central Excise Act 1944 was not maintainable before the Delhi High Court as the order-in-original was passed i [LexDoc Id : 476014]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2014 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
